Turns out there are some benefits to shrinking your attention span to nothing!
As reported by Monica Nickelsburg, on any given day, the average
American teenager spends more than 7.5 hours online and uses his or her
cellphone 60 times. While these numbers strike fear in the hearts of
parents and crotchety novelists lamenting the loss of a more meaningful
existence, there are some real benefits to a technology-saturated life:
Young people spend far more time consuming new information, honing
verbal concision, and interacting with a diverse audience than they have
at any point in history.
Social media
might render us mean and unhappy, but it also makes us more
intelligent, according to a new study. Research suggests social media
can improve verbal, research, and critical-thinking skills, despite
popular concern about the damaging effects of the internet on
impressionable youths.
Stanford professor Andrea Lunsford
collected 877 freshman composition papers from 1917 to 2006 to study the
ways technological advances have changed the quality of writing. Often
the biggest complaint about "digital natives" is lazy prose — a tendency
to use abbreviations and poor grammar — but Lunsford's research
suggests that's a myth. She discovered there was virtually no change in
the number of errors in composition papers over the past century. She
also found that by 2006, papers were six times longer, more thoroughly
researched, and more complex than those written in 1917.
"Student
writers today are tackling the kinds of issues that require inquiry and
investigation as well as reflection," Lunsford told The Globe and Mail.
Of
course, major advances in education over the past century need to be
accounted for when reviewing Lunsford's findings. But there is one
change inextricably tied to social media: Young people spend far more
time writing outside the classroom than ever before. They spend hours on
extracurricular composition in the form of tweets, texts, emails,
comments, photo captions, and discussion boards.
It's easy to
write this off as meaningless chatter and narcissistic navel-gazing, but
Lunsford's findings suggest it does influence quality of writing. Sites
with character counts, like Twitter, are particularly beneficial
because they teach users to be economical with language.
Digital
connectedness can also provide students with a greater sense of purpose
in their work. Writing for an engaged, responsive audience often
motivates people to make their work more compelling, even if they're
just composing a 140-character tweet.
Clive Thompson, author of Smarter Than You Think: How Technology Is Changing Our Minds for the Better, explains why this wide range of readers is beneficial:
One
good example is allowing children to write for this incredible, global
audience. When kids are writing a paper for a teacher, they sort of
don't care, because they know the teacher doesn't care, they are being
paid to read this, it's just an assignment and a grade. But as soon as
you connect them with an authentic audience, the same way adults do on
blogs and Twitter, the kids completely throw themselves into the work.
Once
they saw their first comment from someone outside the classroom, their
entire world shifted, because they understand they are thinking
publicly, and that catalyzes them to produce something better. They go
over their work and ask others to critique it before posting. Teachers
who had struggled to get kids to write a two-page book report suddenly
found they would willingly compose a painstakingly researched 35,000
word walk-through of their favorite video game.
That's not to
say social media doesn't have negative effects. Even Thompson and
Lunsford recognize that the impact of technology on young minds is
complicated. One clear casualty of the digital revolution is our
attention spans. Ten years ago the average attention span was 12
minutes. In just a decade it's been reduced to five seconds.
"The
distraction issue is real and significant, you can't get certain types
of important thinking and work done if you're constantly darting around
from one thing to another," Thompson told The Verge. "The
problem is, we currently have this information ecology that has been
designed to capture as much of your attention as possible."
Research
also suggests that Facebook can contribute to feelings of sadness and
dissatisfaction. But these symptoms of social media, while unfortunate,
are not inconsistent with Lunsford's and Thompson's findings. After all,
if history is any indicator, unhappiness and intelligence are not
mutually exclusive.
Subscribe to the NetLingo Blog via Email or RSS here!
- See more at: http://www.netlingo.com/#sthash.pESXXNEI.dpuf
Does social media make us smarter?
Posted by
Erin